BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZNAME:GMT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
DTSTART:19701025T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=-1SU
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZNAME:BST
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
DTSTART:19700329T010000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=-1SU
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:6a78089c55bda
DTSTAMP:20260809T045700Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20240523T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20240523T170000
TZID:Europe/London
SUMMARY:Transition and the Historiographical Vagaries of Silent American Cinema
DESCRIPTION:When first introduced as a concept specific to early cinema in an essay for Cinema Journal in 1991, the notion of "transition" came firmly attached to the name and work of D.W. Griffith. Subsequently, it was broadened to apply to all American filmmaking from 1907-1913, and then later again to define a period that stretched into the late 1910s. Thirty years since its initial coinage, the "transitional era" has proven nearly as durable a label as "cinema of attractions," and while less influential, it still invites its share of dispute. Criticized as both teleological and provisional, too yoked to classicism and insufficiently applicable to national contexts other than that of the U.S., the "transitional era" has weathered numerous challenges to remain an historiographically durable way of thinking about late-period early cinema.    With the advent of numerous methodologies designed to expand our purchase on early / silent cinema, including media archaeology and André Gaudreault's useful label of institutionalization, transition warrants renewed interrogation.  What remains useful about the idea of transition?  How does it intersect with and inform ongoing developments in our investigation of silent American cinema?  By examining phenomena as diverse as the development of continuity editing, the exploitation of the star system, and the mechanisms of self-regulation and self-promotion endemic to this period, I will make the case that transition has persisted as a conceptual and historiographic category because it continues to have explanatory utility.    Charlie Keil is Professor in the Cinema Studies Institute and Department of History at the University of Toronto, where he is also Principal of Innis College and a member of the President's Teaching Academy. He has published approximately 50 journal articles and book chapters and is the author and/or editor of eight books, the most recent of which are Editing and Special/Visual Effects, co-edited with Kristen Whissel (2016), A Companion to D.W. Griffith (2018), and the Oxford Handbook of Silent Cinema, co-edited with Rob King (2024). His teaching has been recognized with the SCMS Distinguished Pedagogy Award, as well as the Faculty of Arts & Science Outstanding Teaching Award and the President's Teaching Award at the University of Toronto. https://events.st-andrews.ac.uk/events/transition-and-the-historiographical-vagaries-of-silent-american-cinema/
LOCATION:Film Studies Boardroom, 99 North Street, KY16 9AD, St Andrews, Fife, Scotland
URL:https://events.st-andrews.ac.uk/events/transition-and-the-historiographical-vagaries-of-silent-american-cinema/
End:VEVENT
End:VCALENDAR